Two audiences
The same evaluation, two reasons to want it
Whichever side you are on, the method is identical. The only difference is who receives the report — and we do not tune the result to who is paying.
Buyers & enterprises
You're about to depend on an AI. Prove it first.
- De-risk a purchase or deployment before it touches customers
- Get an independent read for risk, security and procurement
- Replace a vendor's marketing numbers with tested ones
- Know exactly what to fix — or walk away — before you commit
Vendors & builders
Let someone independent say it works.
- Turn “trust us” into an outside, evidence-backed report
- Shorten enterprise sales — hand buyers a third-party read up front
- Find your real failure modes before a customer does
- Show the working: buyers increasingly ask how the numbers were made
Same rigor, either way
The tests, the held-out sets, the red-team and the scoring are the same whoever commissions the work. A report that could be softened for the person paying for it would be worth nothing to the person reading it.
Not yet decided. Engagement types and pricing — [[one-off evaluation]], [[re-evaluation]], [[continuous monitoring]].