Governance

Standards alignment

We align our evaluation method to recognised AI risk and quality frameworks, so findings map to the language your governance teams already use.

Precisely worded, on purpose. Our method is aligned with and informed by these frameworks. We do not assess conformity against them, and we are not an accredited assessor for any of them.

NIST AI Risk Management Framework

Used to structure risk across the lifecycle — govern, map, measure, manage — so findings sit in a shape risk teams recognise.

ISO/IEC 42001

The AI management-system standard. We borrow its vocabulary so our findings slot into an organisation's existing AI governance rather than sitting in a silo.

Recognised safety benchmarks

Public risk and reliability benchmarks inform how we design our safety and robustness tests, alongside the domain-specific cases we build for you.

Verify before publishing. Confirm exactly which frameworks to name, and have someone check each mapping. List only frameworks we actually apply — an unearned logo on this page would undo the entire premise of the site.